Re: Mutli6 meeting in Vienna

[Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>]

Well, I need to see a single taxonomy, not a bunch of
independently drafted half proposals. But I agree that
we need to focus on fatal flaws and major advantages, not
on details.

   Brian

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> On vrijdag, mei 9, 2003, at 10:45 Europe/Amsterdam, Brian E Carpenter
> wrote:
> 
> > I think what would be excellent would be for someone to open the
> > meeting
> > with an overview of the classes of solutions. We may need to launch
> > parallel
> > efforts, so agreeing which classes of solution we want to develop is
> > an important first step.
> 
> It seems we're still not at the stage where there is agreement on
> whether any given type of solution is viable or not. Waiting for Vienna
> and then discuss all the details in a meeting is not the most efficient
> use of time. I suggest that everyone submits solution classes to be
> presented and we then identify the central issue with that class
> beforehand so we don't have to be sidetracked by either minor details
> or fairly obvious fatal flaws in the meeting. This should allows us to
> focus on what's important.
> 
> Iljitsch