RE: IETF multihoming powder: just add IPv6 and stir

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

I don't agree.  But do what you want.
/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist [mailto:kurtis@kurtis.pp.se] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 4:38 AM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum; J. Noel Chiappa; multi6@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IETF multihoming powder: just add IPv6 and stir
> 
> 
> 
> 
> But Noels list for me is more criteria for a specific 
> solution (loc/id 
> separation) rather than a general list?
> 
> - kurtis -
> 
> On söndag, maj 11, 2003, at 11:24 Europe/Stockholm, Bound, Jim wrote:
> 
> > I agree but Noel's list is a good list for the community to 
> see.  We 
> > cannot not put good stuff out because people will do bad 
> things with 
> > it and also that is far to political of a viewpoint to ever achieve 
> > progress for our efforts here.
> >
> > /jim
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:iljitsch@muada.com]
> >> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 5:21 AM
> >> To: Bound, Jim
> >> Cc: J. Noel Chiappa; multi6@ops.ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: IETF multihoming powder: just add IPv6 and stir
> >>
> >>
> >> On zondag, mei 11, 2003, at 11:02 Europe/Amsterdam, Bound, 
> Jim wrote:
> >>
> >>> we need to capture what Noel listed here for sure.
> >>
> >> At the same time we have to be careful that we don't go 
> through this 
> >> list and pick the option we like best for each item. It's pretty 
> >> clear that any solution will include some parts that aren't great. 
> >> The only way to judge the "not great" part is by evaluating the 
> >> solution as a whole and compare it to other fleshed out solutions.
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
>