RE: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> I don't believe that there is much disagreement between the anonymous
> reviewer and the rough consensus of the WG. IIRC, the "consensus
> assessment" of the WG it that this requirement document is a mixed bag
> of contradictory wishes, and cannot actually serve as a requirement spec
> in a "contractual" way. It is however mildly useful as a list of issues
> solution designers should be concerned with. It is also about as good as
> it is going to get, and we should move on. Maybe the IESG should
> paraphrase that in the application statement...

how about cutting me a break and put that in the document.

randy