Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> I think the review is written from the viewpoint of a solution
> or class of solutions. The draft is written more from a utopic
> viewpoint. So I don't think most of the comments can actually be
> transformed into text changes.

i think the fear is that solutions workers will hit "it does not
meet requirement 14.3"

> The best fix I can suggest is to take this sentence from the
> Abstract:
> 
>> This document outlines a set of goals for proposed new IPv6
>> site-multihoming architectures.
>
> and add to it something like
>  It is recognized that this set of goals is ambitious and that
>  some goals may conflict with others, and that the solution or
>  solutions adopted will be able to satisfy only some of them.

works for me

randy