Re: draft-ietf-multi6-multihoming-requirements-06.txt

[S Woodside <sbwoodside@yahoo.com>]

On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 03:24  PM, Jay Ford wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, S Woodside wrote:
> } is there a need to /always/ have management of path selection?
>
> I'm arguing that there is always a need to have the /option/ of 
> managing the
> path selection.  The option might not always have to be used, but if 
> we don't
> build in the option now, it won't be there when needed.
OK. That's good, because then it's possible to satisfy the naïve user 
with a system that allows NO management of path selection, and will 
"just work" (auto-configure).

simon