Re: Reasonable to use crypto in all communications? (Re: Fwd: Minutes/Notes)

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Marcelo;

> > So far, it is just a well known MITM attack no specific to multihoming.
> 
> Again, have you heard about time shifting attacks?

Have you ever serached the phrase "time shifting attacks" on the web?

There is no such attack.

Please don't try to invent new terminology for nothing.

> This type of attack is not possible in regular IPv6 communications and
> multi-homing mechanisms can enable them.

Wrong.

> The same goes for some flooding attacks.

By inventing "time shifting attack", you ignore two facts, at least.

One is that DoS can not be prevented.

The other is that there is timeout on bindings.

							Masataka Ohta