Re: Minutes / Notes

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>>>> AFAIK there is no published standard for DHVPv6
>>>
>>> And there is no published standard for LIN6, though LIN6 does
>>> exist in IPv6.
>>
>> There are a lot of things that exists and that is related to IP, TCP,
>> UDP and the Internet that is not standard.
>>
>>> It should be noted that people working on IPv6 autoconfiguration
>>> now assumes DHCPv6.
>>
>>  From what I have been reading people seems to be assuming DHCPv6 and
>> 2462.
>
> Are you now saying DHCPv6 defined? If you are saying it defined,
> where, do you think, I can find your definition?

Ok, poor wording in the mail you quoted and the one before that. With 
defined I meant published as standard. As Ralph points out in his mail 
this is however close though.

> From what I have been reading some people seems to be assuming
> DHCPv6 by ignoring 2462. Some other people seems to be simultaneously
> assuming both DHCPv6 and 2462 ignoring the contradiction between them.

This I agree with.

> While I can continue the argument, others may not. As an expert on
> autoconfiguration issues, my advice on the WG is that multi6 WG
> should ignore autoconfiguration entirely unless useful definition
> of it could be defined by someone else.
>

Agreed. All this started with the discussion on what was said in the 
minutes, and this is way off-topic.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBPyZkgKarNKXTPFCVEQL7cwCggmQSsGxL1+7lT5dausw5Ka3swtoAoMuH
r1n0d5XV8P+S9kPeuEJSqVH+
=/9zy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----