[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)

To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Subject: Re: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:41:34 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es, iljitsch@muada.com, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: "Your message with ID" <3B729725-0A53-11D8-AB34-000A9598A184@kurtis.pp.se>
Reply-to: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

> > Perhaps a bit; but the policies can be worked on separately from the
> > mechanisms and the policies can evolve at a different rate in the 
> > future.
> >
> 
> Would it make sense to add that into the next version of the draft?

I can add that into 02 (since while nobody was looking a generated
01 versions of NOID and SIM - I'd forgotten to discuss at least
the premeditated redirection attacks in 00).

  Erik

References:
- Re: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>

Prev by Date: Re: About carring information in the next header value
Next by Date: Re: survivability, rewriting
Previous by thread: Re: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
Next by thread: RE: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread