Re: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On onsdag, okt 29, 2003, at 16:41 Europe/Stockholm, Erik Nordmark wrote:

>
> But these types of policy considerations for selecting locators is
> independent of the actual rehoming mechanisms I think.

Agreed.

>> Would it not be better to simply say that survivability and
>> "restoration" time is due to these X factors, they can be influenced 
>> by
>> this - but they are not an issue per se for the multi6 layer. They
>> might depend on ULP signaling, BGP convergence, etc. But that is
>> another issue.
>>
>> Am I making my life to easy here?
>
> Perhaps a bit; but the policies can be worked on separately from the
> mechanisms and the policies can evolve at a different rate in the 
> future.
>

Would it make sense to add that into the next version of the draft?

Best regards,

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6Aq9qarNKXTPFCVEQLwjACfcYbGX9ST9+BTBlYCbIWbm9KF3ucAoNJT
4GXUlmRfWOoDaJOad5BynVLO
=/+Ez
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----