[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?

To: "Erik Nordmark" <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, "masataka ohta" <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: RE: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
From: "marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:37:31 +0100
Cc: <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1067948779.21545.nordmark@bebop.france>
Reply-to: <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>

> But part of the point is that there is a solution to make DNS more secure.
> Once that is starting to get deployed it would be nice if we haven't
> designed a multihoming solution which makes the network less secure again.

Fully agree
besides not all of the communications actually use the DNS, you can
establish a communication direclty using IP addresses.
Regards, marcelo

>
>    Erik
>
>

References:
- Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Alternatives to source address rewriting (was RE: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
Next by Date: Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
Previous by thread: Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
Next by thread: Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread