[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?

To: masataka ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Subject: Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:14:15 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: "Your message with ID" <3FA8F423.1000007@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Reply-to: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

masataka,

> It is *YOUR* assumption.

Nope - it was *YOU* who suggested to use DNSsec to store public keys.
An outline of a suggestion of mine is in draft-nordmark-multi6-sim-01.txt
and it doesn't add any use of DNS, secure or not.

   Erik

Follow-Ups:
- Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
  - From: masataka ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

References:
- Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
  - From: masataka ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
Next by Date: Re: Alternatives to source address rewriting (was RE: Preserving established communications (was RE: about draft-nordmark-multi6-noid-00)
Previous by thread: Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
Next by thread: Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread