Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?

To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Subject: Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
From: masataka ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 22:28:45 +0900
Cc: multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1068038055.28774.nordmark@bebop.france>
References: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1068038055.28774.nordmark@bebop.france>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Erik;

It is *YOUR* assumption.

Nope - it was *YOU* who suggested to use DNSsec to store public keys.

It has nothing to do with *YOUR* assumption.

Read your mail on what was *YOUR* assumption, if you still insist
on your broken analysis and proposals.

Masataka Ohta

References:
- Re: multi6-threats-00.txt vs. MIPv6 - different strength verifications?
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>