Re: Bash IETF, not RIRs

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

On 13-okt-03, at 5:23, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> Back to your idea of having a full routing table in each host. We've 
> talked about this and things haven't changed in the mean time. Without 
> aggregation, this makes sense, as a host then knows what's reachable 
> and what isn't, and maybe even gets to determine which path to a 
> certain destination is shorter. But all this very useful information 
> is hidden behind aggregation. For instance, if you want to determine 
> whether you want to reach me through my 3ffe:2500:310::/48 or my 
> 2001:888:1dde::/48 prefix, you're not going to be able to see whether 
> those are reachable, as the /48s aren't going to be in the global 
> routing table, just 3ffe:2500::/32 and 2001:888::/32.