Re: Bash IETF, not RIRs

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On onsdag, okt 15, 2003, at 08:19 Europe/Stockholm, Pekka Savola wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
>> Well, the discussion that the RIRs have come up with a faulty policy
>> should. As Ray pointed out, the RIRs crates no policy. It's created on
>> globalv6 and should go there. Mostly as feedback to the people
>> discussing the policy. As for the routing table size discussion, I
>> think that is ok.
>
> Well, as a matter of fact, many RIRs *do* create their own ad-hoc
> additional policies (e.g., special PI allocations to "critical
> infrastructure"), with little regard to globalv6, so this view is not
> entirely accurate.
>
> For "high-level" policy discussions, globalv6 is probably the best 
> place
> to have them.
>

Even those policies are not created by the RIRs. By the RIR community 
perhaps, but not by RIRs.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP4zq/6arNKXTPFCVEQKUDwCg4dS8RSgYo6F7nB1BWC6lbNF6rIoAn0BS
mBsGtVn7UUiiA4+tkmuhGd26
=o20X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----