Re: Summary of work areas

["Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>]

My list may be more cross-area than multi6 has a stomach for, although
I've been astonished at the sense of humor of the chairs so far, but I
wonder about these related topics:

- what multihoming switching looks like to applications (especially
whether/how applications might select locators)
- any possibilities for loadsharing
- transport reaction to multihoming switching (or explicitly assume
end-to-end adaptation continues to be the right answer)

Although it's outside my own area, I also wonder about interaction of
multihoming with renumbering.

Spencer

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tony Li" <Tony.Li@procket.com>
To: <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 2:02 PM
Subject: Summary of work areas



Hi,

To help Elliot out, I'd like for us to start thinking
about our top level work items.  As top level items,
they should, IMHO, be as independent as possible (tho
not wholly independent).  They should not be nested and
they should not be about the details.

Here's a strawman:


Threat analysis
Locator storage & distribution
Mappings between locators, identifiers, and FQDNs
Security solutions
Exit addressing

Additions, modifications?

Tony