[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: noid and applications (generic requirements from applications)

To: Juan Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es>
Subject: Re: noid and applications (generic requirements from applications)
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:40:46 +0100
Cc: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, Multi6 Mailing List <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <200311132211.20946.jrh@it.uc3m.es>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On torsdag, nov 13, 2003, at 22:11 Europe/Stockholm, Juan Rodriguez 
Hervella wrote:

> The Ilijtshc's comment raise the question whether multihoming should be
> solved at the IP layer. I'm sure that applications can find out a 
> (better)
> multihoming solution.
>

I don't agree with that line of thought.  One does not imply the other.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP7QIcaarNKXTPFCVEQL79ACg7bKIxoiCYvIs5eCY0Kg0+7qLDc0AnjBF
Pg9unSv45bXL+04qSx6AJ8a7
=BI0j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: noid and applications (generic requirements from applications)
  - From: Juan Rodriguez Hervella <jrh@it.uc3m.es>

Prev by Date: Re: noid and applications (generic requirements from applications)
Next by Date: Re: security requirement for multi6
Previous by thread: Re: noid and applications (generic requirements from applications)
Next by thread: Re: noid and applications (generic requirements from applications)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread