Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]

To: mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es
Subject: Re: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:25:37 +0900
Cc: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>, Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>, multi6@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <LIEEJBCNFDJHFFKJJDPAAECFDHAA.mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>
References: <LIEEJBCNFDJHFFKJJDPAAECFDHAA.mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

marcelo;

IMHO we should just pick one of the above for now and see if it is enough.
By now, i just don't care which one, stack, endpoint...


What's wrong with the "end system", which is the most authentic
terminology directly related to the end to end principle?

Masataka Ohta

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
  - From: "marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>

References:
- RE: Terminology [Re: Some Comments on ID/Loc Separation Proposals]
  - From: "marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>