RE: Draft of updated WG charter

["marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>]

Hi Brian, Kurtis

I don't understand the reason for including:

> Development of specific solutions will require approval of the IESG (e.g.,
a recharter).

I mean, why is not enough that the wg defines the solution or set of
solutions to be developed and then do it?

thanks, marcelo

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org]En
> nombre de Brian E Carpenter
> Enviado el: jueves, 08 de enero de 2004 15:58
> Para: Multi6
> Asunto: Draft of updated WG charter
>
>
> As promised, here is a draft proposed by the co-chairs as an update
> to the multi6 charter. Please read and comment. We'd like to forward
> this for IESG approval within a week or two.
>
>   Brian and Kurtis