Re: Draft of updated WG charter

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-01-08, at 19.10, marcelo bagnulo wrote:

> Hi Brian, Kurtis
>
> I don't understand the reason for including:
>
>> Development of specific solutions will require approval of the IESG 
>> (e.g.,
> a recharter).
>
> I mean, why is not enough that the wg defines the solution or set of
> solutions to be developed and then do it?

Without having discussed with Brian or Bert....

There have always been a comment along these lines in the charter. Even 
if we where to develop a solution here, we would need to add new 
milestones, and update the charter. To the best of my knowledge, that 
still has to go through the IESG. So this is merely stating a fact of 
the process.

Best regards,

- - kurtis -



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBP/5UWKarNKXTPFCVEQJTdACbB5JnwKMTBph/Zw4JJCmGtlJhkaQAoJES
UmSpedkF2ZSAHwpUGztew9Af
=YRKT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----