Re: Draft of updated WG charter

[jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)]

    > From: vijay gill <vgill@vijaygill.com>

    > Also, I am going out on a limb here and say that any m-homing solution
    > that requires end-host updates is a non-starter from the get-go.

If the WG as a whole agrees with you (and this is an important point to nail
down - my guess would be that they do not), then you've basically eliminated
all solutions to the problem other than recycling Mobile-IPv6 mechanisms
(since the charter rules out "let the routing do it", which means it has to
be done via use of multiple addresses).

I'm curious as to why you want to rule out any changes to the end-hosts. I
note that Mobile-IPv6 didn't restrict themselves in this way.

	Noel