RE: Draft of updated WG charter

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

> On 2004-01-08, at 19.10, marcelo bagnulo wrote:
> 
> > Hi Brian, Kurtis
> >
> > I don't understand the reason for including:
> >
> >> Development of specific solutions will require approval of the IESG 
> >> (e.g., a recharter).
> >
> > I mean, why is not enough that the wg defines the solution or set of
> > solutions to be developed and then do it?
> 
> Without having discussed with Brian or Bert....
> 
> There have always been a comment along these lines in the charter. Even 
> if we where to develop a solution here, we would need to add new 
> milestones, and update the charter. To the best of my knowledge, that 
> still has to go through the IESG. So this is merely stating a fact of 
> the process.
> 
Exactly.

Bert