Re: Routing based proposals [Re: Draft of updated WG charter]

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-01-11, at 15.31, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> So far, nobody has come to multi6 with a proposal based on changes to
> inter-domain routing. Absent any such proposal, we won't be working
> on this approach. So the challenge to people who think there is an
> IDR-based option is clear. Until then, I suggest we don't waste our
> time discussing it.
>
> Actually, we don't have any proposals based on any kind of change to
> routing algorithms, as far as I can see.
>
> So let's discuss the proposals we do have, not those we don't have, OK?

Actually to underline what Brian said in his mail after this. If you 
have more ideas on a solution, this is the time to submit the -00 
draft. Not to reopen discussions....

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQAGqSaarNKXTPFCVEQKw/ACfac4tVmHBfzy3X7tIb5cHRD3yJ8sAn38J
SQHbSciEsheBWAqW+MJkmSnm
=crxu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----