Re: Reminder re multi6 drafts

[Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>]

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> On 23-jan-04, at 11:44, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > The WG will have to take an architectural decision at some point
> > whether to pursue transport layer solution(s). Without the SCTP
> > case being on the table, we will be handicapped. If anybody else
> > feels like doing even a superficial job on SCTP in the next few
> > days, that would be very helpful.
> 
> What would have to be in this draft?

If I knew that, would I be asking?-)

I think my question is: can part of SCTP be extracted to make a generic
layer 4 (or 3.9, or whatever) mh solution? At least in principle?

   Brian