RE: Reminder re multi6 drafts

["marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>]

There was a draft by Lode submited a while ago about multihoming issues and
sctp

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-coene-sctp-multihome-04.txt

Perhaps this could be a starting point?

Regards, marcelo

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org]En
> nombre de Brian E Carpenter
> Enviado el: viernes, 23 de enero de 2004 11:45
> Para: Bound, Jim
> CC: multi6@ops.ietf.org
> Asunto: Re: Reminder re multi6 drafts
>
>
> Jim,
>
> We understand of course that there are only 168 hours a week.
>
> The WG will have to take an architectural decision at some point
> whether to pursue transport layer solution(s). Without the SCTP
> case being on the table, we will be handicapped. If anybody else
> feels like doing even a superficial job on SCTP in the next few
> days, that would be very helpful.
>
>    Brian
>
> "Bound, Jim" wrote:
> >
> > SCTP will not happen before this month.  Randy, Yanick, and I cannot get
> > it done.  Sorry.
> > /jim
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org
> > > [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:36 PM
> > > To: multi6@ops.ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: Reminder re multi6 drafts
> > >
> > >
> > > It's getting very close to the end of January. We are still
> > > hoping for HIP and SCTP based drafts this month, so that they can
> > > be thoroughly analyzed before the IETF.
> > >
> > >    Brian
> > >
> > > Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Just a reminder that we'd like all updated or new drafts describing
> > > > possible approaches to solutions for multi6 to be submitted in the
> > > > near future. We originally suggested a hard deadline of the end
> > > > of December, but since people found that too rigid, let's try for
> > > > having all the I-Ds available by mid-January at the latest.
> > > > In addition to the existing proposals discussed in Minneapolis,
> > > > we are at least expecting HIP and SCTP based contributions.
> > > >
> > > > We do ask that each draft includes a *short*
> > > self-assessment against the
> > > > goals in RFC 3582. For convenience, please name them as
> > > >   draft-AUTHOR-multi6-...
> > > >
> > > > Please remember that one of our objectives is to identify
> > > architectural
> > > > components that occur in the various proposals.
> > > >
> > > > The co-chairs are acutely aware that the published charter for this
> > > > WG is out of date. We do plan to fix that.
> > > >
> > > >    Brian
> > > >    multi6 co-chair
> > > > --
>