Re: Reminder re multi6 drafts

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


To echo Brian. If someone could at least write up an email to the list, 
I think is a good starting point. But again, there is only 24h a day...

- - kurtis -

On 2004-01-23, at 11.44, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Jim,
>
> We understand of course that there are only 168 hours a week.
>
> The WG will have to take an architectural decision at some point
> whether to pursue transport layer solution(s). Without the SCTP
> case being on the table, we will be handicapped. If anybody else
> feels like doing even a superficial job on SCTP in the next few
> days, that would be very helpful.
>
>    Brian
>
> "Bound, Jim" wrote:
>>
>> SCTP will not happen before this month.  Randy, Yanick, and I cannot 
>> get
>> it done.  Sorry.
>> /jim
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org
>>> [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:36 PM
>>> To: multi6@ops.ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: Reminder re multi6 drafts
>>>
>>>
>>> It's getting very close to the end of January. We are still
>>> hoping for HIP and SCTP based drafts this month, so that they can
>>> be thoroughly analyzed before the IETF.
>>>
>>>    Brian
>>>
>>> Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> Just a reminder that we'd like all updated or new drafts describing
>>>> possible approaches to solutions for multi6 to be submitted in the
>>>> near future. We originally suggested a hard deadline of the end
>>>> of December, but since people found that too rigid, let's try for
>>>> having all the I-Ds available by mid-January at the latest.
>>>> In addition to the existing proposals discussed in Minneapolis,
>>>> we are at least expecting HIP and SCTP based contributions.
>>>>
>>>> We do ask that each draft includes a *short*
>>> self-assessment against the
>>>> goals in RFC 3582. For convenience, please name them as
>>>>   draft-AUTHOR-multi6-...
>>>>
>>>> Please remember that one of our objectives is to identify
>>> architectural
>>>> components that occur in the various proposals.
>>>>
>>>> The co-chairs are acutely aware that the published charter for this
>>>> WG is out of date. We do plan to fix that.
>>>>
>>>>    Brian
>>>>    multi6 co-chair
>>>> --
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQBIp7aarNKXTPFCVEQLc2gCfXfueNEYxITCYI+lhtsxb7yZECLsAoOm2
0qPb80wZ53UZl/LLT1otOwru
=NfHW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----