Re: Reminder re multi6 drafts

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Kurt;

When is the deadline to write up the email for SCTP based and
other proposals?

						Masataka Ohta

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> To echo Brian. If someone could at least write up an email to the list, 
> I think is a good starting point. But again, there is only 24h a day...
>
> - - kurtis -
>
> On 2004-01-23, at 11.44, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>
> > Jim,
> >
> > We understand of course that there are only 168 hours a week.
> >
> > The WG will have to take an architectural decision at some point
> > whether to pursue transport layer solution(s). Without the SCTP
> > case being on the table, we will be handicapped. If anybody else
> > feels like doing even a superficial job on SCTP in the next few
> > days, that would be very helpful.
> >
> >   Brian
> >
> > "Bound, Jim" wrote:
> >
> > > SCTP will not happen before this month.  Randy, Yanick, and I cannot 
> > > get
> > > it done.  Sorry.
> > > /jim
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org
> > > > [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 1:36 PM
> > > > To: multi6@ops.ietf.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Reminder re multi6 drafts
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's getting very close to the end of January. We are still
> > > > hoping for HIP and SCTP based drafts this month, so that they can
> > > > be thoroughly analyzed before the IETF.
> > > >
> > > >   Brian
> > > >
> > > > Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Just a reminder that we'd like all updated or new drafts describing
> > > > > possible approaches to solutions for multi6 to be submitted in the
> > > > > near future. We originally suggested a hard deadline of the end
> > > > > of December, but since people found that too rigid, let's try for
> > > > > having all the I-Ds available by mid-January at the latest.
> > > > > In addition to the existing proposals discussed in Minneapolis,
> > > > > we are at least expecting HIP and SCTP based contributions.
> > > > >
> > > > > We do ask that each draft includes a *short*
> > > >
> > > > self-assessment against the
> > > >
> > > > > goals in RFC 3582. For convenience, please name them as
> > > > >  draft-AUTHOR-multi6-...
> > > > >
> > > > > Please remember that one of our objectives is to identify
> > > >
> > > > architectural
> > > >
> > > > > components that occur in the various proposals.
> > > > >
> > > > > The co-chairs are acutely aware that the published charter for this
> > > > > WG is out of date. We do plan to fix that.
> > > > >
> > > > >   Brian
> > > > >   multi6 co-chair
> > > > > --
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3
>
> iQA/AwUBQBIp7aarNKXTPFCVEQLc2gCfXfueNEYxITCYI+lhtsxb7yZECLsAoOm2
> 0qPb80wZ53UZl/LLT1otOwru
> =NfHW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----