DRAFT of the architecture presentation for the WG session this week

[Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>]

In the interests of allowing everyone to come armed with the appropriate 
weapons for
this agenda topic, I've attached a PDF of the current version of the draft.

I may (will) change the presentation between now depending on the response
from this list,, but I would obviously prefer a little shaking out in the 
wg on the
more generic topic of "is this architectural taxonomy on the right track" and
"have I missed an architectural taxonomy element?"

But of course any comment is helpful  - but saying that I want comments
on this list is perhaps just adding more jet fuel to the inferno  - I don't see
this as a reticent group!


  Geoff

Attachment: 2004-02-17-multi6-arch.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document