Re: on the point of mobility & multihoming

[Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>]

Geoff Huston wrote:

> I did stress in my presentation to the wg that slide 3 was misleading in a
> number of  ways.

One of a mistake, among many, of your presentation was to
say too much about mobility even though there is little
architectural relationship between mobility and multihoming.

It is one of a reason why your presentation should be ignored.

An even worse mistake is that you consider some layer can magically
solve the problem, which is the *ARCHITECATURAL* reasoing for *NAT*.

For proper solutions, all the layers above IP must be involved,
which was the first step of the architectural analysis.

By insisting on sigle layers and pretending not to make any decision,
you drop the core architectural point to consider multiple layers
in a single solution.

Thus, your presentation is no step of moving forward.

					Masataka Ohta