Re: New proposal for multi6 interim meeting

[Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>]

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> On 11-apr-04, at 19:07, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > After analyzing the various responses received, we now propose a
> > one day meeting on Monday June 14 in California, either Santa Monica
> > or the Bay Area.
> 
> Is it useful to have an interim meeting 6 weeks before the next IETF
> meeting? This leaves no time to publish new drafts.

We believe that a full day of meeting is the only way to make
progress. Since the main output should be a revision of the
(future) architectural analysis, I can't see why publication
of an update would be impossible.

> Also, having both the interim meeting and the next IETF meeting in more
> or less the same place distributes the travel burden very unevenly.

That is true. But it's the best compromise we could find.

   Brian