Re: New proposal for multi6 interim meeting

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-04-11, at 19.24, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> On 11-apr-04, at 19:07, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>> After analyzing the various responses received, we now propose a
>> one day meeting on Monday June 14 in California, either Santa Monica
>> or the Bay Area.
>
> Is it useful to have an interim meeting 6 weeks before the next IETF 
> meeting? This leaves no time to publish new drafts.

The intention of the interim meetings is to meet and discuss two drafts 
that might make it to WG documents and have a through discussion on the 
architectural analysis draft. I don't think these discussions will 
trigger the need for new drafts, but they might trigger updates of 
existing ones. And for that there should be enough time.

I do agree it's tight, but we (Brian should get the credits for this 
thoguh) have really struggled to find suitable dates.

> Also, having both the interim meeting and the next IETF meeting in 
> more or less the same place distributes the travel burden very 
> unevenly.

I agree, but this was the way most people could attend. :-(

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQHpd+6arNKXTPFCVEQIfaQCg3eu/0azNCbzed/HDGL7lNx43R2EAoI1Y
XDUnVo9rMGDSj77fN6j60JiB
=ztM5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----