RE: New proposal for multi6 interim meeting

["Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>]

just as note june 14th is same date US IPv6 Summit begins and if you all
want to do this I can probably get a room for the day via the IPv6 Forum
to be used in Santa Monica.  The summit is for newbees so not suggesting
that is useful to anyone.  see 
 http://www.usipv6.com/  very nice place for a meeting too and holiday
after :--)  a few of the folks here will be there too :--)


/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-multi6@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kurt Erik Lindqvist
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 5:15 AM
> To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Cc: Multi6; Brian E Carpenter
> Subject: Re: New proposal for multi6 interim meeting
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On 2004-04-11, at 19.24, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> > On 11-apr-04, at 19:07, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >
> >> After analyzing the various responses received, we now 
> propose a one 
> >> day meeting on Monday June 14 in California, either Santa 
> Monica or 
> >> the Bay Area.
> >
> > Is it useful to have an interim meeting 6 weeks before the 
> next IETF 
> > meeting? This leaves no time to publish new drafts.
> 
> The intention of the interim meetings is to meet and discuss 
> two drafts that might make it to WG documents and have a 
> through discussion on the architectural analysis draft. I 
> don't think these discussions will trigger the need for new 
> drafts, but they might trigger updates of existing ones. And 
> for that there should be enough time.
> 
> I do agree it's tight, but we (Brian should get the credits for this
> thoguh) have really struggled to find suitable dates.
> 
> > Also, having both the interim meeting and the next IETF meeting in 
> > more or less the same place distributes the travel burden very 
> > unevenly.
> 
> I agree, but this was the way most people could attend. :-(
> 
> - - kurtis -
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3
> 
> iQA/AwUBQHpd+6arNKXTPFCVEQIfaQCg3eu/0azNCbzed/HDGL7lNx43R2EAoI1Y
> XDUnVo9rMGDSj77fN6j60JiB
> =ztM5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
>