RE: PI space for very big sites [Re: stable addressing]

["marcelo bagnulo" <mbagnulo@ing.uc3m.es>]

> On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, marcelo bagnulo wrote:
> > I agree that very big sites probably will get PI.
> > I also agree that the complex issue is to define the criteria used for
> > asigning.
> >
> > But i think this is not a problem for this wg nor the IETF,
> imho this is a
> > problem for the RIRs
>
> I agree that this is a problem for the RIRs (or more appropriately,
> the global-v6 discussion list) as soon as multi6 has said "It's all
> right by us for you to try to figure out if you can specify PI
> allocations for very big sites".
>
> First, IMHO, we need to get to the point that we (as in, the IETF)
> thinks going down that road is a good idea.
>
> Nothing prevents RIRs taking this up on their own, of course, but if
> there is multi6 "encouragement" or "blessing", it's certainly going to
> help in the process...

agree.
IMHO we won't be able to stop big sites to get PI
i guess that we are still delaying our "blessing" until we provide an
alternative solution, as attractive as we can, so that as many sites as
possible will preffer it over the PI option (especially if getting PI is
hard)

Regards, marcelo

>
> --
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>
>