RE: PI space for very big sites [Re: stable addressing]

[Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>]

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, marcelo bagnulo wrote:
> I agree that very big sites probably will get PI.
> I also agree that the complex issue is to define the criteria used for
> asigning.
> 
> But i think this is not a problem for this wg nor the IETF, imho this is a
> problem for the RIRs

I agree that this is a problem for the RIRs (or more appropriately,
the global-v6 discussion list) as soon as multi6 has said "It's all
right by us for you to try to figure out if you can specify PI
allocations for very big sites".

First, IMHO, we need to get to the point that we (as in, the IETF) 
thinks going down that road is a good idea.

Nothing prevents RIRs taking this up on their own, of course, but if 
there is multi6 "encouragement" or "blessing", it's certainly going to 
help in the process...

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings