Re: PI space for very big sites [Re: stable addressing]

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-04-21, at 16.13, Pekka Savola wrote:

> I agree that this is a problem for the RIRs (or more appropriately,
> the global-v6 discussion list) as soon as multi6 has said "It's all
> right by us for you to try to figure out if you can specify PI
> allocations for very big sites".
>
> First, IMHO, we need to get to the point that we (as in, the IETF)
> thinks going down that road is a good idea.
>
> Nothing prevents RIRs taking this up on their own, of course, but if
> there is multi6 "encouragement" or "blessing", it's certainly going to
> help in the process...

This is already happening with micro allocations.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQIgYcaarNKXTPFCVEQIQjgCZAS9UPn+e3uc+Gyjvkgq986Fi/xYAoICu
aNgRF/VSgnrUBi5iRAhVHgZq
=6WGK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----