Re: PI space for very big sites [Re: stable addressing]

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-04-23, at 05.57, Pekka Savola wrote:

> Yes, but micro allocations aren't necessarily being globally routed.

True, but then again - there is nothing that we can write that will 
influence what is routed where. That is an economic decision and back 
to the "no-peer" BGP community discussion.

> I'm a bit worried about Marcelo's approach, i.e., just delaying until
> we have a solution (for some multi6 sites).  If that solution isn't
> going to work for the specific kind of sites, we've just delayed their
> v6 set-up for a couple of years, made them go around the policies,
> start requesting v6 NATs, etc.

And that is a concern that should be reflected in what this WG ends up 
proposing.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQIjBUqarNKXTPFCVEQI0gwCgtDX36hvHjBcYrFkhe5qBQWfkNpMAoISY
V2LB2Lkf1AwrU8z8eOO9L4Ea
=eOdD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----