[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")

To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:12:51 +0900
Cc: Multi6 List <multi6@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <40D8AAB1.3040203@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0406191425470.6330-100000@netcore.fi> <200406191307.26836.ripe-lst@eirconnect.net> <20040621162012.GD6204@Space.Net> <200406211820.15292.ripe-lst@eirconnect.net> <20040621173141.GH6204@Space.Net> <3717B75A-C40F-11D8-BBBB-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D8185A.7030900@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <E7618C9F-C445-11D8-860C-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D82BE0.90404@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <0B9FE26D-C44E-11D8-860C-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D83B58.90906@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <73777057-C456-11D8-860C-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D849E2.6010105@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6FAEC6CE-C467-11D8-860C-000A95928574@kurtis.pp.se> <40D87CE8.7010909@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <40D8AAB1.3040203@zurich.ibm.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Brian E Carpenter wrote:

>  > There supposed to be a hard limit on the number of TLAs.
> 
> The concept of TLAs was removed from the IPv6 architecture
> quite some time ago.

It is it a problem, as discussed in the past meeting.

							Masataka Ohta

References:
- Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
- Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
  - From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: optimum routing table size
Next by Date: Re: optimum routing table size
Previous by thread: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Next by thread: Re: Fallacy by Kurt (was Re: IPv6 Policy Clarification - Initial allocation criteria "d)")
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread