Q2 Re: revision of architecture draft is now published

[Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>]

And here is the second question:

Do people think the Appendix to this draft, which is a preliminary
analysis of various proposed approaches, should become a separate
document? If the answer is yes, we have to discuss with our Area
Director how this would fit into the WG charter.

   Brian

Geoff Huston wrote:
> draft-huston-multi6-architectures-01.txt has been published by the drafts editor. This version integrates comments made by working group members on the -00 version and also includes material proposed in the interim multi6 working group meeting earlier this month.
>
> I would like to propose to the chairs that the working group consider:
>
> - that this document be adopted as a working group document, and
>
> - that the appendix of this document be split off from the main text of the document and separately developed as a working group document.
>
>
> thanks.