Geoff, thanks.
Because of the way our charter is currently written, we have two separate
questions to the WG. Here is the first one:
Do people agree to adopt this draft as a WG draft (which means
that the next update will be draft-ietf-multi6-architectures-00.txt)?
That doesn't mean you have to agree that it's perfect, just that it
is a good basis for a WG deliverable.
Please answer this question without worrying whether the Appendix
is split off, and please respond by July 9th.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Brian E Carpenter
Distinguished Engineer, Internet Standards & Technology, IBM
Geoff Huston wrote:
draft-huston-multi6-architectures-01.txt has been published by the
drafts editor. This version integrates comments made by working group
members on the -00 version and also includes material proposed in the
interim multi6 working group meeting earlier this month.
I would like to propose to the chairs that the working group consider:
- that this document be adopted as a working group document, and
- that the appendix of this document be split off from the main text
of the document and separately developed as a working group document.
thanks.