Re: identifiers and security

[Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


[Catching up a bit]

On 2004-06-28, at 13.52, Erik Nordmark wrote:

>
> Thus something which is quite insecure (weaker than NOID as above) when
> IPsec isn't used, but when IPsec is used it is as strong as with IPsec 
> in
> today's Internet.
> Is anybody interested in exploring these ideas further?

Personally I think that we at some point need to clarify the "do no 
harm" view. I.e do we want to try and achieve something better than 
today? Or is relying on the security extension headers of IPv6 give us 
some slack? Or do we just agree that the world is ok today and trying 
to do better is shooting for the stars?

I personally wouldn't mind aiming for something a bit higher than today.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQOPD0qarNKXTPFCVEQLbjACgpMCLlTWA5QTXLStMOEJKErl/Dx0An33D
oVSIXu9eHjQktzyFIVta6/uc
=p8By
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----