[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-hba-00.txt
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 17:18:35 -0000,
>>>>> <matthew.ford@bt.com> said:
>> Francis Dupont wrote:
>> ...
>>> PS: BTW CGA IPR holders provide royalty-free licenses only for SEND,
>>> can they update their IPR texts on the IETF web for HBAs too?
>>
>> We could leave this issue until we have a WG chartered and
>> an item intended for the standards track. But it would be nice.
> Note that KAME at least have concerns with the SeND IPR such that they
> are refusing to implement. If there's a revision to IPR statements
> taking place for HBA, perhaps this also creates an opportunity to
> address KAME's concerns.
At the risk of making off-topic response (so I won't send further
responses on this particular topic here), the KAME concerns are
described at:
http://www.kame.net/newsletter/20040525/
(search "(7) SEND IPR" for details)
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp