[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Multi6 next steps - consensus call

Eliot Lear was the only person to comment, somewhat disagreeing
tactically with items 3 and 4, but not with the intent to do
the work in the Internet Area. The chairs take this as a consensus
to open discussion with the Area Directors, as well as
urging the design team to tidy up their drafts (item 1) and
draft the solution architecture (item 2).

   Brian + Kurtis

Brian E Carpenter wrote: 
Multi6 people,

At the meetings this week, the design team drafts were discussed,
and consensus in the room was positive for the following questions:

1. Do we agree that the way forward is the direction and
   work produced by the design team [modulo the missing pieces,
   including choosing site-exit routers]?

2. Do we agree on the need for a solution architecture document?

3. Do we agree to recommend a new working group in the Internet Area
   to follow up the design team approach?

4. Do we agree to close down multi6 when its current work is done?

If you *disagree* with any of the above, please respond to the
list, with a short explanation, in the next few days.

   Brian + Kurtis
   co-chairs

PS: the drafts in question are
    Multihoming Level 3 Shim Approach
    (draft-nordmark-multi6dt-shim-00.txt)
    Hash Based Addresses (HBA)
    (draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-hba-00.txt)
    Functional decomposition of the M6 protocol
    (draft-bagnulo-multi6dt-functional-dec-00.txt)
    Failure Detection and Locator Selection in Multi6
    (draft-arkko-multi6dt-failure-detection-00.txt)
    Multi6 Application Referral Issues
    (draft-nordmark-multi6dt-refer-00.txt)