[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 8.1) <get-all> (OOPS, should be 13.8)

To: netconf@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: 8.1) <get-all> (OOPS, should be 13.8)
From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:43:44 -0800
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20040209123511.02d594c8@fedex.cisco.com>

At 12:37 PM 2/9/2004, Andy Bierman wrote:

This is issue 13.8, not 8.1

Andy

>Hi,
>
>I think we should change the name of this operation
>from <get-all> to a simple <get>.  This aligns better
>with terminology and behavior of a get command in
>other protocols. 
>
>I know the status says this is closed, but <get-all>
>is redundant and non-intuitive.  We should fix this
>before it's too late.
>
>Andy
>
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/> 


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

References:
- 8.1) <get-all>
  - From: Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: 8.1) <get-all>
Next by Date: Re: 8.1) <get-all>
Previous by thread: 8.1) <get-all>
Next by thread: Re: 8.1) <get-all>
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread