Re: 8.1) <get-all>

[Rob Enns <rpe@juniper.net>]

<get> works for me.

thanks,
 Rob

On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:37:43PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think we should change the name of this operation
> from <get-all> to a simple <get>.  This aligns better
> with terminology and behavior of a get command in
> other protocols. 
> 
> I know the status says this is closed, but <get-all>
> is redundant and non-intuitive.  We should fix this
> before it's too late.
> 
> Andy
> 
> 
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>