Re: 8.1) <get-all>

[Margaret Wasserman <margaret@thingmagic.com>]

I agree that <get> would be better.

Margaret

At 12:37 PM 2/9/2004 -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we should change the name of this operation
> from <get-all> to a simple <get>.  This aligns better
> with terminology and behavior of a get command in
> other protocols.
>
> I know the status says this is closed, but <get-all>
> is redundant and non-intuitive.  We should fix this
> before it's too late.
>
> Andy
>
>
> --
> to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
> the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
> archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>