[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive

To: tstoddar@utstar.com
Subject: Re: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:18:14 +0100
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <002701c3f713$d4787810$5d2410ac@nj.us.utstar.com> (tstoddar@utstar.com)
References: <002701c3f713$d4787810$5d2410ac@nj.us.utstar.com>

>>>>> Tim Stoddard writes:

Tim> OOPs <?Netconf_EOM?>

Can you please explain why you think <?Netconf_EOM?> is more
"identifiable" than <?EOM?>?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder		    International University Bremen
<http://www.eecs.iu-bremen.de/>	    P.O. Box 750 561, 28725 Bremen, Germany



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
  - From: "Tim Stoddard" <tstoddar@utstar.com>

References:
- RE: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
  - From: "Tim Stoddard" <tstoddar@utstar.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue 10.4) <running> Configuration
Next by Date: RE: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
Previous by thread: RE: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
Next by thread: RE: Issue 5.1) SSH End of message directive
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread