Re: Issue 10.4) <running> Configuration

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Tim Stoddard" <tstoddar@utstar.com>
> To: "Netconf (E-mail 2)" <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:40 AM
> Subject: RE: Issue 10.4) <running> Configuration
>
>
> Sorry to chime in so late on this, I don't think it was necessarily closed
> in the interim or in Minneapolis. As a multi-product vendor to the RBOC, IXC
> and ILEC markets as well as SP's we have multi-service devices that have
> multiple running configs and they are managed in a master/multi-sub agent
> environment and cannot be combined to effectively produce a single master
> running-config. I don't think this group has addressed the issues of master
> to multiple sub-agent environments or multiple running configs and I don't
> want to see this constraint eliminate some of the most sophisticated devices
> from reaping the benefits of what should prove to be an extensive and
> flexible leap forward in configuration management.
...

For the environments I'm familiar with, this question would be intimately
tied up with the question of the scope of locking mechanisms, particularly
if locks affected what could be done through other management
interfaces.

Randy



--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>