[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: little problem with <close-session>
Margaret,
My goof. I misread the RFC. It is based on who requests the close (the
other guy then closes). So if the agent wants to close, the manager
would initiate the close. On the other hand, in the case you are
concerned about, as currently written, when the manager wants to close,
it would be the agent that initiates the close.
RFCs in question are 3080 and 3081. 3081 has the TCP mapping.
I'd like to understand how much the CLOSE_WAIT concern is real. The
problem with HTTP 1.0 is that each site would create tens of connections
to retrieve a page. In addition, sessions were VERY short lived. Will
either of these cases be generally true?
Eliot
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>