[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NETCONF WG minutes for IETF #60
hi
The minutes say that instead of removing the stuff in section 7 of the
protocol draft since we (netmod) want to include it in our content
discussion
"Instead, a warning in each section
will be added to explain that a NETCONF data modelling standard document is
expected to supercede this text at some time in the future."
I don't remember that. Was this just until our stuff progressed to be
working group documents? That almost sounds familiar. This protocol draft
wouldn't go to RFC with the duplicated text would it?
Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Bierman [mailto:abierman@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:22 PM
To: proceedings@ietf.org
Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
Subject: NETCONF WG minutes for IETF #60
<clip>
--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>