RE: NETCONF WG minutes for IETF #60

[Andy Bierman <abierman@cisco.com>]

At 01:17 PM 9/3/2004, Sharon Chisholm wrote:
>hi
>
>The minutes say that instead of removing the stuff in section 7 of the
>protocol draft since we (netmod) want to include it in our content
>discussion
>
>"Instead, a warning in each section 
>will be added to explain that a NETCONF data modelling standard document is
>expected to supercede this text at some time in the future."
>
>I don't remember that. Was this just until our stuff progressed to be
>working group documents? That almost sounds familiar. This protocol draft
>wouldn't go to RFC with the duplicated text would it?

We did discuss this a little bit -- we don't want the data model
stuff to disappear until (if and when) a NETMOD WG is formed
and produces a document to replace this text.  I think these
sections should remain in the NETCONF protocol document as
non-normative appendices.  


>Sharon

Andy



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Bierman [mailto:abierman@cisco.com] 
>Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:22 PM
>To: proceedings@ietf.org
>Cc: netconf@ops.ietf.org
>Subject: NETCONF WG minutes for IETF #60
>
><clip>
>
>--
>to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
>the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
>archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/> 


--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>