[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: NETCONF over TLS

To: badra@isima.fr
Subject: Re: NETCONF over TLS
From: Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:03:04 +0200
Cc: � <netconf@ops.ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <63214.86.72.162.197.1182013900.squirrel@www.isima.fr>
References: <46729B3B.9090403@andybierman.com> <20070615181423.GC13774@elstar.local> <63214.86.72.162.197.1182013900.squirrel@www.isima.fr>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070604)

Hello,

Why do you feel we need a new transport mapping? What would that give us, why is it better thenSSH and BEEP?You describe in your document what you intend to do, but please motivate us by stating why isthis a good idea?

regards Balazs

--
to unsubscribe send a message to netconf-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/netconf/>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: NETCONF over TLS
  - From: Mohamad Badra <badra@isima.fr>

References:
- NETCONF over TLS
  - From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
- Re: NETCONF over TLS
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
- Re: NETCONF over TLS
  - From: badra@isima.fr

Prev by Date: Re: NETCONF over TLS
Next by Date: RE: NETCONF over TLS
Previous by thread: Re: NETCONF over TLS
Next by thread: Re: NETCONF over TLS
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread